How Democrats Can Stand for Something (6/3/03)

by Dean Hartwell

Sometime between now and Election Day 2004, the Democratic Party will have to define itself and tell the voters why they, and not the Republicans, ought to be elected.  Here are some suggestions as to how they can achieve this goal and win back the White House and Congress.

 

First, the party must remember its recent history.  When blacks in the South and elsewhere demanded their rights to vote, buy property and send their children to integrated schools, the Democratic Party rose to the challenge by passing laws and even sending the National Guard to enforce those laws.  Many Republicans, on the other hand, believed it was OK to refuse to sell property to a black person.

 

When women demanded rights equal to men’s, the party led a near-successful effort to pass the Equal Rights Amendment.  The Republicans, meanwhile, stopped putting the ERA in their platform in 1980, the year it nominated Ronald Reagan for president.  And more recently, President Clinton enacted over GOP opposition the “don’t ask, don’t tell” rule, allowing gays to serve in the military.

 

The current focus on rights has shifted to another area: privacy.  Thanks to President Bush’s Patriot Act, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other law enforcement agencies have extensive access to our medical, financial, mental health and student records (Source: American Civil Liberties Union, “Protect our Bill of Rights”).  This law from the party that constantly screams about the need for less government!  Here, the Democratic Party can seize the initiative and demand a repeal of the Patriot Act and all similar laws in the name of privacy rights.

 

In other current events, the Bush Administration recently used military force in Iraq.  Not only did the invasion take place under questionable pretenses, it marked yet another time our nation has turned on a dictator that it once supported.

 

This inconsistency should beg the obvious question for the Democrats: why do we support dictators to begin with?  Democratic President Jimmy Carter had it right when he said his Administration’s support for a nation would depend upon its human rights record.  His mistake was not applying this credo to the Shah of Iran, later toppled by Muslim extremists angry with the United States for supporting the Shah.  Conditioning support by human rights could be a winning issue for Democrats.

 

Lastly, Bush’s reckless tax cuts and the ensuing budget deficits hand the Democratic Party a golden opportunity to remind the voters about fiscal responsibility.  Under President Clinton, budget deficits from the previous Republican presidents turned into large surpluses.  Now Bush has squandered these surpluses away thanks to huge tax cuts, the kind of which Clinton refused.

 

Privacy…human rights…fiscal responsibility.  These are themes worth fighting for.  It is time for the Democratic Party to start fighting.

 

Archives